chore(dgx): snapshot consolidation WIP pour transfert poc DGX
Regroupe le WIP non committé requis pour le clone/runtime DGX (Option A) : - api_stream.py : préflight replay + smoke santé modèles + handler 403 WP-B - de-hardcode VLM : vlm_config, gpu/*, vram_orchestrator, ollama_manager - stream_processor, semantic_matcher, agent_chat (app/planner/intent) - workflows.db (acquis ; le transfert artifacts le mettra à jour + rewrite chemins) - docs : plans DGX, benchmarks VLM/grounders, recherche SOTA, coordination 8 juin Snapshot destiné à la branche poc-dgx poussée sur Gitea pour cloner le DGX. Scan anti-secret : clean. graphify (repo embarqué) exclu. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
12
AGENTS.md
Normal file
12
AGENTS.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
## graphify
|
||||
|
||||
This project has a knowledge graph at graphify-out/ with god nodes, community structure, and cross-file relationships.
|
||||
|
||||
When the user types `/graphify`, invoke the `skill` tool with `skill: "graphify"` before doing anything else.
|
||||
|
||||
Rules:
|
||||
- For codebase questions, first run `graphify query "<question>"` when graphify-out/graph.json exists. Use `graphify path "<A>" "<B>"` for relationships and `graphify explain "<concept>"` for focused concepts. These return a scoped subgraph, usually much smaller than GRAPH_REPORT.md or raw grep output.
|
||||
- Dirty graphify-out/ files are expected after hooks or incremental updates; dirty graph files are not a reason to skip graphify. Only skip graphify if the task is about stale or incorrect graph output, or the user explicitly says not to use it.
|
||||
- If graphify-out/wiki/index.md exists, use it for broad navigation instead of raw source browsing.
|
||||
- Read graphify-out/GRAPH_REPORT.md only for broad architecture review or when query/path/explain do not surface enough context.
|
||||
- After modifying code, run `graphify update .` to keep the graph current (AST-only, no API cost).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user